Fintech

The UK Is a Fintech Regulatory Superpower

Simon Taylor Posted September 21, 2023

The UK is home to some of the largest payments companies and most successful neobanks in the world, Wise, Starling, and Monzo among them. That success has been bolstered by the fact that the UK is among the world’s most innovative financial services regulatory environments. 

Regulation is generally a blocker to innovation. But the UK has used it to foster domestic competition and successfully grow its global presence. If Europe is the world’s regulatory superpower, then the UK has quietly become Europe’s financial regulatory superpower (even post-Brexit). 

The UK is the goldilocks of financial services: big enough to be meaningful on a global scale, but small enough to make decisions much faster than the U.S. or the rest of  Europe. If you want to see the future of financial services regulation, look to the UK

The foundation: UK’s banking market and infrastructure

In 2010, the UK was dominated by a small handful of large banks. In the wake of the financial crisis, the government nationalized one of the largest banks and had to intervene in several others. To counter this “too big to fail” risk—and to promote the UK as a global tech hub—the UK kicked off a policy initiative to become a global superpower in financial services and technology.

To do this, it played to its structural strengths: 

The UK was an early adopter of fintech infrastructure.

The UK has had real-time payments since 2005, via the Faster Payments network. In 2007, it became one of the first markets in the world to issue contactless (tap-to-pay) cards. (A full 8 years earlier than the U.S.) Today, consumers in the UK use contactless payments for nearly 90% of face-to-face payment transactions. And UK institutions continue to invest: This summer, Mastercard, Barclays and the London Stock Exchange Group announced a £1 billion fintech fund to back British growth-stage fintech companies.

London combines elements of New York, Washington, and the Bay Area.

There are very few cities on the global stage where you could walk from the central bank to Parliament to the head office of the world’s largest banks and tech companies. The UK is a global financial center. 

UK common law is a global standard.

The vast majority of international trade happens in UK law. Common law is very sensible. Judges are required to attempt to make a “common sense” reading of the facts and circumstances. While it uses case law as a base, it is far less mechanical than U.S. law. Therefore, it is generally perceived as fair and neutral.

The UK time zone trades with Asia and the Americas.

The UK is almost ideally placed for international offices for time zone overlap. 

These advantages laid the groundwork for the UK to position itself as a global leader in fintech. UK regulatory bodies have advanced that vision through various initiatives—including advancing Open Banking, enacting trust-instilling consumer protections, and supporting emerging fintech companies at early stages.

How UK regulation spurs fintech

Creating a better path to banking licenses 

Becoming a bank has a cold start problem.

You can’t get a license without capital to absorb potential losses and be financially sound. And you can’t get funding to build a bank without getting a license. So the UK did something elegant. It split the process in two.

Many digital banks, like Starling and Monzo, got a banking license “with restrictions” designed for start-up companies that do not yet have the required regulatory capital. This enabled them to unlock further funding as VC-backed growth companies over time.

Giving fintech access to the central bank

In the U.S., only banks can access systems like Fedwire, and funds must be stored at a bank. As we saw with the recent banking crisis, despite protections, this is not always a guarantee of security. Access to the central bank would reduce the risk for fintech company deposits and create pricing competition with the banking sector.

In the UK, fintech companies can get accounts with the central bank and access its payments systems. Companies like Wise, Modulr, and Form3 have unlocked this capability for fintech and non-finance companies. 

Establishing a clear standard for Open Banking 

In the U.S., Open Banking is a market-led movement, which has limitations: conversion via open banking drops below 60% in many cases, especially with the largest banks. In 2018, EU regulators enacted the second Payment Services Directive (PSD2), which created rules for third parties to access payment account data. If PSD2 got people thinking about Open Banking and the potential for tech to disrupt financial services, the Open Banking Implementation Entity—a UK company that created a model for future data sharing and set Open Banking API standards—clearly defined how it would work. 

Screen scraping (using your login credentials to let software login and retrieve your data) had been around for 5 years—with limited uptake. The whole point of Open Banking was that it was official and secure. 

Companies like Truelayer, Yapily, and Credit Kudos (acquired by Apple) benefited from these standards. In the UK, you can pay your tax bill with HM Revenue and Customs with an open banking initiated payment. The UK has built on this capability with a service called Variable Recurring Payments (VRP), a form of payment instruction that enables a merchant to securely offer subscriptions (or auto-pay) with a single click, direct from a user’s bank account. 

Developing a regulatory sandbox to support financial innovation at early stages

The UK was the first market in the world to create a regulatory sandbox. The Sandbox helps firms at earlier stages of their growth with support, such as individual guidance for how regulation might apply and waivers or modifications to rules if your company tests something novel or innovative. Since its launch, companies as diverse as BNPL provider Zilch, Open Banking provider Bud, the London Stock Exchange, and Barclays have entered the Sandbox.

The sandbox has now been made “digital.” This means companies can access synthetic data based on real bank customers (such as Barclays or Lloyds), allowing them to prove their effectiveness beforehand. The UK has also launched a digital assets Sandbox for tokenized securities, helping to make the complex requirements around securities more available to innovators.

Passing legislation that provides guidelines and consumer protections around digital assets

In June 2023, the UK passed the Financial Services and Markets Act, which classifies crypto as a regulated financial activity and empowers regulators to supervise its adoption. The act provides capital requirements for Stablecoin issuers, defines consumer rights, and gives legal certainty to consumer protections. 

The future of fintech in the UK

The last decade saw a generation of iconic global brands coming to the market. UK regulators’ forward-looking policies—introducing a permanent digital sandbox, providing licensing for digital asset businesses, and introducing innovations like VRP—provide the ultimate “why now.” Moreover, neobanks are profitable in a market with low card-swipe fee revenue, indicating the maturity of the regulation built over the past decade. 

The new and old regulatory innovations are accelerating fintech’s success. The creativity of UK entrepreneurs has and will continue to disrupt the status quo in financial services.

See a16z.com/global-payments for more. 

About the Contributor

Simon Taylor

is the Head of Content & Strategy at Sardine, a behavior-based fraud, compliance, and payments platform. He writes the weekly newsletter Fintech Brainfood.

Want More a16z Fintech?

Commentary and analysis on recent news, and compelling trends in the fintech space.

Learn More
Recommended For You

Fintech Fuels Global Payments

Angela Strange, Joe Schmidt, Gabriel Vasquez, Lauren Murrow, and Denis Young
Fintech

Software Transcends Borders—Why Not Money?

Angela Strange, Joe Schmidt, and Gabriel Vasquez
Fintech

Why India Leads in Digital Payments

Matt Flannery
Fintech

Brazil’s Surprising Fintech Tailwind

Angela Strange and Flora Oliveira
Fintech

The Company of the Future is Default Global

Anish Acharya, Angela Strange, Seema Amble, and Joe Schmidt

Want More Fintech?

Commentary and analysis on recent news, and compelling trends in the fintech space.

Sign Up On Substack

Views expressed in “posts” (including podcasts, videos, and social media) are those of the individual a16z personnel quoted therein and are not the views of a16z Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. a16z Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell — or a solicitation of an offer to buy — any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.

The contents in here — and available on any associated distribution platforms and any public a16z online social media accounts, platforms, and sites (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) — should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here or on a16z content distribution outlets are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources, including from portfolio companies of funds managed by a16z. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, a16z has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. In addition, posts may include third-party advertisements; a16z has not reviewed such advertisements and does not endorse any advertising content contained therein. All content speaks only as of the date indicated.

Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website — or on associated content distribution outlets — be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles — which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters.

There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available here: https://a16z.com/investments/. Past results of a16z’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Excluded from this list are investments (and certain publicly traded cryptocurrencies/ digital assets) for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly. As for its investments in any cryptocurrency or token project, a16z is acting in its own financial interest, not necessarily in the interests of other token holders. a16z has no special role in any of these projects or power over their management. a16z does not undertake to continue to have any involvement in these projects other than as an investor and token holder, and other token holders should not expect that it will or rely on it to have any particular involvement.

With respect to funds managed by a16z that are registered in Japan, a16z will provide to any member of the Japanese public a copy of such documents as are required to be made publicly available pursuant to Article 63 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan. Please contact compliance@a16z.com to request such documents.

For other site terms of use, please go here. Additional important information about a16z, including our Form ADV Part 2A Brochure, is available at the SEC’s website: http://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.