The Incredible Sinking Bubble (Debating the Tech Bubble with Steve Blank: Part III)

This post originally appeared as my closing argument in our debate in The Economist.

Technology stocks currently trade at an all time low vs. industrial stocks based on forward P/E ratios. Nonetheless, the esteemed and brilliant Mr. Blank argues that we are in a technology bubble.

When I pointed this out, Mr. Blank modified his argument to say that the bubble would only be seen in the new companies. This is odd, because in the previous technology bubble of 1999-2000, the veteran companies such as Cisco, Sun, and Oracle experienced meteoric rises in their share prices.

Nonetheless, let’s look at the prices of the new technology IPOs that Mr. Blank highlights in his argument:

LinkedIn—Mr. Blank’s poster child harbinger of the bubble is down 30% since Mr. Blank quoted its stock price.

Pandora—Is down 17% since its IPO.

RenRen and YouKu—The Chinese Internet companies that Mr. Blank referenced are down more than 50% and 25% respectively.

So, this is a technology IPO bubble in which all of the bubble companies are going down in price. Perhaps we should rename it the Incredible Sinking Bubble.

Of course, Mr. Blank’s primary argument is not logical, but rather, it’s psychological. He unspools a captivating theory with four psychological phases: stealth, awareness, mania, and blow off. He follows that up with a personification of investor categories: Smart Money, Shills, Marks, and True Believers designed to create empathy for the poor victims of the technology bubble and portray the others as sophisticated con men poised to take advantage of “your neighbors, parents, or grandparents.” I find these arguments to be most appropriate, because bubbles are not logical. They are, in fact, psychological.

Specifically, before a market can enter a bubble, the bubble psychological precondition must be met. The precondition is the same for all bubbles: the overwhelming majority of the population must believe that prices will continue to go up. In essence, in the great balance of fear and greed, there must be overwhelming greed and a vacuum of fear. Otherwise, prices will remain logical and no bubble will emerge.

Has the psychological precondition been met for the great technology bubble of 2011?

It turns out that there is plenty of fear in today’s financial markets in general and in the technology market in particular. Stocks are at their lowest point in two decades and technology stocks are at an all time low vs. industrials. I imagine the readers of the Economist are leading thinkers on these matters whose advice and inclinations will likely be followed by the larger population. As of this writing, 68% of the people who voted in this debate believe that we are already in a bubble. If 68% of Economist readers and their followers do not believe that prices will rise indefinitely, then it stands to reason that prices won’t rise and, low and behold, they haven’t. We should not be surprised by the Incredible Sinking Bubble, because it’s not really a bubble at all. In fact, it’s just the opposite: the balance has swung so far to the fear side that people believe we’re in a bubble even though we are in a boom.

 

 

 

The views expressed here are those of the individual AH Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) personnel quoted and are not the views of a16z or its affiliates. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources, including from portfolio companies of funds managed by a16z. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, a16z has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation.

This content is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. You should consult your own advisers as to those matters. References to any securities or digital assets are for illustrative purposes only, and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Furthermore, this content is not directed at nor intended for use by any investors or prospective investors, and may not under any circumstances be relied upon when making a decision to invest in any fund managed by a16z. (An offering to invest in an a16z fund will be made only by the private placement memorandum, subscription agreement, and other relevant documentation of any such fund and should be read in their entirety.) Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z, and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by Andreessen Horowitz (excluding investments and certain publicly traded cryptocurrencies/ digital assets for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly) is available at https://a16z.com/investments/.

Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Please see https://a16z.com/disclosures for additional important information.

Want more a16z?

Sign up to get our best articles, latest podcasts, and news on our investments emailed to you.