We’ve been in a bull market for enterprise software-as-a-service (SaaS) for over 11 years, and it has been all about growth. Not only has the number of SaaS companies exploded, but companies like Slack, Zoom, and Shopify have grown into multi-billion dollar public companies during this time.
But with COVID-19, many SaaS founders find themselves in the unchartered territory of running a business amid extreme economic uncertainty, so we’re hearing three big questions from SaaS founders:
We examined how SaaS businesses weathered the 2008 economic crisis, not to make market predictions, or to compare 2008 to today – the current situation is unprecedented (it is happening much faster and is a health as well as an economic crisis) – but to help SaaS companies know where to focus in hard times. For businesses that are already generating revenue and that have found product-market fit, leaders should prioritize retention, focus on profitable acquisition, and manage costs to preserve runway.
The short answer to the above questions: In a volatile market, SaaS businesses should focus on efficiency, before growth.
In a volatile market, SaaS businesses should focus on efficiency, before growth.To understand how SaaS companies managed in the last economic downturn, we analyzed 18 public SaaS companies’ revenue growth and overall operating income burn from pre-recession 2007 through 2011. We then plotted the revenue growth and efficiency of growth for four of the most successful companies. Additionally, we have included the median trend line from all 18 of the companies that we looked at, as well as the trend line for worldwide software spend.
What we see: SaaS revenue was still growing, just more slowly, and SaaS companies were becoming more efficient.
Charts are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon when making any investment decisions; past performance is no guarantee of future results.
As the first graph shows, SaaS growth slowed in 2009 – this is unsurprising, as software spending declined by 20+ percentage points in the previous three market crashes in 2009, 2000, and 1997. However, while total software spend declined, SaaS companies still grew in 2009. This growth is driven in part by the adoption of SaaS from on-premise software. The median SaaS company grew 10% in 2009, with only 4 companies (Ariba, SoundBite, Kenexa, and Dealertrack) declining in growth. Furthermore, their growth picked back up quickly, with median growth at 19% year-over-year in 2010, with an even sharper uptick in 2011.
Charts are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon when making any investment decisions; past performance is no guarantee of future results.
What’s even more interesting to us, however, is the response to growth these companies took during the recession. Though growth slowed, these companies improved the efficiency of their growth (defined as net new revenue / total overall operating income expense), as shown in the second graph.
For every dollar of net revenue they earned, these companies spent less to get it. What’s more, many maintained their efficiency even when the market began to recover.
For every dollar of net revenue SaaS companies in 2008 earned, they spent less to get it. What’s more, many maintained their efficiency even when the market began to recover.While our purpose in analyzing SaaS companies from 2008 is not to compare then to now, but to instead emphasize the importance of efficient growth rather than pure growth, here are the three things to focus on – and measure – for efficient growth.
In SaaS, but especially in times like these, existing customers are your life blood. The more that you can retain existing customers, the more predictable your revenue stream will be in the future.
To measure retention, look at gross retention (percentage of revenue from a customer segment that remains after 12 months, not including expansion) and net retention (percentage of revenue now received from a customer segment vs. 12 months, including expansion). When analyzing your retention, keep the following in mind:
Acquire customers that are quickly profitable.
Historically, you might have inched above the typically recommended 12-month CAC payback (i.e. customer acquisition cost payback – for every dollar spent on sales and marketing, how many months it takes to pay back through new revenue generated * your gross margin). Today you may want to tighten up acquisition spend and aim for a shorter CAC payback period so you acquire customers that help you generate cash.
Three additional points for thinking through customer acquisition:
Goal #1 is to survive, so first and foremost, know your cash.
You can’t run your business and know how long you have unless you know what your actual cash balance is. That is, how much cash is in the bank – not what’s in an Excel sheet, not what is theoretically going to be collected – and how much you’re actually spending on a weekly and monthly basis. And once you know your cash, be realistic and take into account the cost of acquisition, increased churn, and downsell in your projections. Then plan for 24+ months of runway, including:
* * *
The recurring nature of subscription revenue makes business more predictable. This predictability helps founders to better prepare for market turmoil, and better forecast future revenue and cash.As a class of technology, it’s still very early days for SaaS. We are currently at only ~30% penetration for SaaS in total software spend, and ~6% penetration in cloud spend of total IT spend. Before this current crisis, SaaS was growing 16% year over year and projected to be a nearly $100B market globally in 2020.
SaaS has long been praised for having both an attractive infrastructure (a single code base to enable live updates to the product) and business (subscription revenue) model. In this period of economic turmoil, these can be even more advantageous – just imagine if a business were on-premise in a time where people are being asked to stay off premises!
The recurring nature of subscription revenue makes business more predictable. This predictability helps founders to better prepare for market turmoil, and better forecast future revenue and cash. Additionally, because SaaS is, by definition, hosted software (as a service), SaaS applications have become, for many of us, our new workplace as we shelter-at-home right now. While it’s still early days to make concrete predictions, it’s possible that we could see accelerated cloud/SaaS adoption as employees get used to “the new normal” of a distributed workforce and move further away from on-premise software. SaaS can rapidly – and almost immediately – iterate on the code base, providing much of the fabric for our new distributed work life. We hold meetings in Zoom, talk to colleagues on Slack, and collaborate in a myriad of other applications.
We believe in the SaaS business model, and believe that we still have many, many decades of building amazing SaaS companies. As we saw in the last recession, companies that focus on efficiency over growth are often able to weather the uncertainty. And they tend to come through with huge advantages – including grateful customers poised to reaccelerate their growth,– less competition, and a more efficient business poised for future growth.
—
image: Unsplash | Julian Vinci
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Kristina Shen is our newest general partner, focused on enterprise SaaS and more. Prior to joining a16z, she was part of the Bessemer team that put together their annual “State of the Cloud,” which focused on the track record and signals for measuring the efficiency of SaaS companies.
SOURCES:
1) Gartner, “Gartner Market Databook, 4Q19 Update” (December 2019), “Gartner Market Databook, 4Q16 Update” (December 2016), and “Gartner Market Databook, 4Q13 Update” (September 2014). Growth rates calculated based on Gartner reported metrics.
2) Public company filings from Ariba, athenahealth, Blackbaud, Concur Technologies, Constant Contact, Dealertrack Technologies, DemandTec, Kenexa Corp, LivePerson, NetSuite, Rightnow Technologies, salesforce.com, SoundBite Communications, SuccessFactors, Taleo Corp, Vocus, The Ultimate Software Group, Zix Corporation. A note on attrition data: we included all public SaaS companies from this period, none of whom went out of business.
3) IDC, Worldwide Enterprise Application Spend by SaaS and On-Prem, 2013-2018.
4) Gartner, Worldwide Public Cloud Revenue (Nov 2019), Global IT Spending (Jan 2020).
5) Gartner
Kristina Shen is a former General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz where she focused on enterprise and SaaS investing.
Kimberly Tan is an investing partner at Andreessen Horowitz, where she focuses on SaaS and AI investments.