General

Hiring a Senior Vice President of Engineering

Caroline Horn, Charles Hubbard, and Jenna Zucker Posted June 14, 2023

Hiring a Senior Vice President of Engineering Table of Contents

Note: engineering leaders’ titles tend to be inconsistent across companies. It’s common for founders to assume the role of chief technology officer (CTO), who either runs the day-to-day work of engineering or focuses on a long-term technological vision. While this is a guide to hiring an SVP of engineering, it applies to the growth-stage hire who sits on your executive team and is responsible for the people and productivity management of your engineering team.

As your company scales and your engineering headcount increases, Conway’s Law—often summarized as “ship your org chart”—takes effect. A growth-stage engineering leader understands that how you structure your engineering org will be reflected in your product and partners with your CEO, CTO, or CPO to understand, on a first-principles basis, what products your company needs to bring to market, then translates those into an org structure, reporting lines, team composition, and engineering process that nail product quality and shipping deadlines. 

If you eliminate boundaries and have big teams, then it’s hard to make progress because n-squared people need to communicate and get on the same page. On the flip side, if you want to move super fast and have super small teams, they can get alignment around 5 or 6 people and run very fast. But then all the things they’re building are inconsistent and it’s hard to make all the products work well together. It requires you to understand what you want to build and build your org chart around what you want to build.
Ali Ghodsi, CEO of Databricks, Boss Talk #2

Engineers, especially in startup environments, want to do what’s best for the company, which can often mean late nights, engineering debt, and burnout. As the manager of what is generally the greatest human capital investment in your company—your engineering team—your SVP of engineering not only manages resources, they set appropriate—and realistic—expectations about costs and when they can deliver with the resources they have. A great SVP of engineering adds sanity to the engineering process. They shift the engineering culture from a bootstrapped, frenetic early-stage grind to something more systematic. Ultimately, they’re the advocate the engineering department needs to keep morale high and development rolling and enable long-term success.

While scaling a technical organization, it’s challenging (if not impossible) to determine delivery dates, hit all the right dates, and prioritize development by group consensus. This doesn’t even include the importance of setting the right culture, which is critical for retaining engineering talent. Your SVP of engineering owns all of these things and is responsible for shipping quality products while giving the rest of the organization transparency into the process.
Martin Casado, a16z general partner, Hire a VP of Engineering

TABLE OF CONTENTS

    When to hire

    In the early stages, most companies have an operations-focused engineering leader who is primarily focused on understanding what to build, how to build it, and how to ship it. Once your company is operating at scale, however, you need a leader who can build and ship a cohesive product across a range of teams and engineers. 

    Below are a few signs that companies might need to hire an SVP of engineering: 

    • Your technical CTO or cofounder wants to focus more on tech and less on running the engineering function or managing the team. We’ve seen many growth-stage companies with technical founders hire an SVP of engineering to manage the engineering team and function so the more technical founder can stay closer to the product. 
    • Your rate of shipping slows or you’re missing key dates. This is generally an indication that your org structure and processes aren’t keeping pace with the growth and scale of your company. 
    • You move to a multiproduct structure and need an engineering leader who can manage a diverse group of senior engineering leaders whose incentives aren’t necessarily aligned. Different engineering leaders building different products will lobby for resources and priority, and your SVP of engineering needs to allocate your engineers and get those different groups working toward the same product vision. 

    Writing the MOC

    We discuss writing a mission–outcomes–competencies (MOC) document in greater detail in The Hiring Process.

    What experience should you look for in your SVP of engineering?

    The nature of your product will be the biggest factor in determining what specifically you need in an engineering leader. If you’re building a consumer fintech app, for instance, your SVP of engineering will need to understand how to build out products with robust security features and ensure that your data management practices are compliant with certain regulations. If you’re building a vertical SaaS product with payments processing, you’ll likely want someone who has experience developing a clear, clean API, deep documentation, and an easy-to-use product. If you’re building a cutting-edge LLM, you’ll need a leader who can attract and retain top-notch researchers and create an engineering process that can translate the complex tech of an LLM into a consumer- or enterprise-facing product. On the other hand, a SaaS application company will want a leader who works on a shorter timeline to ship and iterate quickly. 

    For enterprise products, especially infrastructure products, it is critical to integrate with different systems, from workplace collaboration tools and customer relationship management (CRM) tools to marketing automation platforms and business intelligence and automation tools. If you’re building an enterprise infrastructure product, you’ll want a leader experienced in working with more complex architectures and integrations, strict security and compliance requirements, and stress-testing products before batch shipping. If you’re selling that product to bigger customers with higher average contract values (ACVs), you’ll generally want a leader who can be brought in for key sales meetings in order to close deals. 

    What core competencies should you look for in your SVP of engineering?

    Any all-star SVP of engineering:

    • Is part recruiter, part adviser, and part motivator. While attracting and hiring talent is key for almost any growth-stage executive, it’s particularly important for an SVP of engineering because engineering is generally where most late-stage head count is allocated in order to scale at the pace of the company’s growth. As you rapidly scale, your products are only as good as the engineers you hire to build them. Their ability to attract, coach, and retain high-caliber engineers is their core skill set. 
    • Sets up the problem space for engineers. A good SVP of engineering knows that engineers are creative problem-solvers by nature. Rather than prescribe solutions, they define the problem space, lay out who your customers are and what they want from your product, and give your engineers the flexibility to develop and iterate on solutions. 
    • Is technical enough to gain the respect of their engineers and understand how the entirety of the codebase comes together in your product. From a technical perspective, your SVP of engineering typically manages the codebases, cross-product dependencies, technical debt, interoperability, and security of multiple product lines to ensure that your internal resources aren’t overtaxed and your customers have a seamless experience with each of your products. 
    • Has a track record of building successful cross-functional relationships and can influence the executive team on the strategic technical direction of the company.
    • Excels at implementing replicable processes. Generally, technical orgs run agile development to create clarity for teams.
    • Can explain deeply technical concepts to nontechnical peers and customers. This is especially important for leaders in sales-led companies who will likely be brought in to close high-stakes deals.

    What functions should my SVP of engineering own?

    Your SVP of engineering generally owns some or all of the following functions:

    • Engineering
    • Product data science (if data science or AI/ML is a core part of the product) and data analytics
    • Machine learning
    • Technical support and project management
    • Infrastructure and operations
    • Product security
    • Technical product documentation
    • Quality assurance and testing
    • Research and development

    Sample MOC

     

    Setting up your SVP of engineering for success

    We cover best practices in The Hiring Process, but we’ve included some recommendations below for what different members of your executive team may want to focus on when interviewing engineering leaders.

    Do they have the appetite to drill into the details? 

    One of the most common failure modes we see when growth-stage companies hire an SVP of engineering is hiring someone from a big company who is an expert at managing schedules and ship dates but not at understanding the product and who builds it. It’s important for the CEO and product leader to test to see if your candidate still has the hunger and ability to get into the nitty-gritty and details. Will they meet every single engineer on your team, even if that means doing hundreds of one-on-ones over a multi-quarter timeline? 

    Can they pull together accurate execution estimates?

    When it comes to building a new product, your product leader will make recommendations about what to build and why based on their knowledge of the market and the customer. Your engineering leader needs to pull together execution estimates—both head count and CapEx investments—to ascertain what’s feasible for the engineering org to build, based on available resources. Forecasting these estimates incorrectly can lead to pileups of technical debt and burned-out engineers, so it’s critical that your candidate can describe, in detail, how they’ve pulled together execution estimates in the past.

    Do they have the right technical expertise? Do they know how to structure the problem space for the team? 

    If your candidate can’t establish credibility with your technical leadership and best performers, you risk losing some of your best engineering talent and kneecapping whatever progress your engineering org could make. To assess a candidate’s technical ability, it can be helpful to include a top engineer in the interview loop. This can also be a great way to get your highest performers on board with the hire. Your SVP of engineering should also have strong enough technical chops to understand how your codebase fits together and can win the respect of your all-star engineers. 

    Do they understand how customers use the product? Can they help close key customers? 

    Your SVP of engineering should understand the ins and outs of how your product works from the perspective of the customer in order to build and iterate on it—particularly for enterprise companies—and to help close sales deals. Include your sales leader in the interview loop to check whether a candidate can translate technical jargon into accessible explanations. A great SVP of engineering can explain the value of your product in terms of the business problems it solves. Then, when your SVP of engineering joins, consider facilitating a way for them to shadow your product’s onboarding process or common workflows, to make sure they’re aligned with the sales team on how customers use the product.

    Many thanks to Will Larson and Jason Rosenthal for contributing their hard-earned wisdom and expertise to this guide.

    Further reading

    We’ve drawn insights from some of our previously published content and other sources, listed below. In some instances, we’ve repurposed the most compelling or useful advice from a16z posts directly into this guide. 

    On Fear and Leadership—Product to Sales CTOs & CEOs, a16z podcast with Martin Casado, Armon Dadgar, and Sonal Chokshi
    How do you know if your leaders are capable of evolving with your company? When is the right time to bring on a CTO (if any)? On this episode of the a16z podcast, Casado and Dadgar discuss leadership transitions, trade-offs, and whether (or not) it’s a good idea to bring on a CTO.

    Hire a VP of Engineering, Martin Casado
    Your engineering team is the heart of your company, which means you can’t afford to wait too long to hire a VP of engineering. Here, Casado draws on his own experience to break down critical parts of an engineering leader’s job, so you know what to look for when making this critical hire.

    An Elegant Puzzle: Systems of Engineering Management, Will Larson
    Managing an engineering team comes with its own unique challenges. Here, Larson addresses some of the specific challenges engineering leaders face in rapidly growing companies, including paying down technical debt, growing your people, team size, and more. 

    Recommended For You
    Growth

    Good news: AI Will Eat Application Software

    Alex Immerman and Santiago Rodriguez
    Growth

    Leaders, gainers and unexpected winners in the Enterprise AI arms race

    Sarah Wang, Justin Kahl, and Shangda Xu
    General

    Forward-deployed Job Titles

    Tom Hollands
    Growth

    State of Markets

    David George
    Growth

    Alex Immerman

    David George

    Expert News by a16z

    We have built a network of experts who are deeply rooted in technology and how it’s shaping our future. Subscribe to our newsletters to receive their perspectives.

    Views expressed in “posts” (including podcasts, videos, and social media) are those of the individual a16z personnel quoted therein and are not the views of a16z Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. a16z Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell — or a solicitation of an offer to buy — any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.

    The contents in here — and available on any associated distribution platforms and any public a16z online social media accounts, platforms, and sites (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) — should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here or on a16z content distribution outlets are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources, including from portfolio companies of funds managed by a16z. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, a16z has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. In addition, posts may include third-party advertisements; a16z has not reviewed such advertisements and does not endorse any advertising content contained therein. All content speaks only as of the date indicated.

    Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website — or on associated content distribution outlets — be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles — which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters.

    There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available here: https://a16z.com/investments/. Past results of a16z’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Excluded from this list are investments (and certain publicly traded cryptocurrencies/ digital assets) for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly. As for its investments in any cryptocurrency or token project, a16z is acting in its own financial interest, not necessarily in the interests of other token holders. a16z has no special role in any of these projects or power over their management. a16z does not undertake to continue to have any involvement in these projects other than as an investor and token holder, and other token holders should not expect that it will or rely on it to have any particular involvement.

    With respect to funds managed by a16z that are registered in Japan, a16z will provide to any member of the Japanese public a copy of such documents as are required to be made publicly available pursuant to Article 63 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan. Please contact compliance@a16z.com to request such documents.

    For other site terms of use, please go here. Additional important information about a16z, including our Form ADV Part 2A Brochure, is available at the SEC’s website: http://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.