Fintech

Why India Leads in Digital Payments

Matt Flannery Posted September 21, 2023

Why India Leads in Digital Payments Table of Contents

Over the past decade, India’s central bank—the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)—has become one of the most proactive regulators in the world, advancing the digitization of payments and financial services at a rapid pace. Aadhaar, the country’s pioneering digital ID system, and UPI, its real-time digital payments system, are largely regarded as models for delivering financial services and social benefits more widely and efficiently. Because Indian citizens’ digital IDs are linked to their bank accounts, for example, the government was able to electronically transfer relief funds to around 200 million beneficiaries over the course of the pandemic. Recently, a series of regulations providing more flexibility and guidelines for digital lenders, in particular, has extended fintech’s reach to a larger swath of the population.

When my co-founders and I launched Branch in 2015, our mission was to deliver world class financial services to the mobile generation. Initially, we were focused on Africa—mainly Kenya, Tanzania, and Nigeria. But around 2017, we began to develop an interest in India.

The foundation: Why is India such fertile ground for fintech?
 

At the time, the market seemed poised for a fintech boom for a variety of reasons. 

The groundwork was Aadhaar (“foundation” in Hindi), a nationwide database established by the government in 2009 to enable digital identity verification. The vision: Each Indian citizen would be given a unique, 12-digit identification number, which could be cross-referenced with biometric information (fingerprints, iris scan data, and facial photograph) and basic biographical information held in a centralized government database. By 2019, the government had issued a unique ID to nearly every adult resident in India; today, the system is used by 1.3 billion Indians, over 90% of the population. This helped with fraud and enabled smooth KYC compliance. 

In addition, the government created bank accounts for nearly the entire population. Approximately 80% of Indian adults own a bank account today (although many remain dormant). This made the prospect of reaching people in rural areas—with no access to a bank branch—a real consideration. 

Third, the government was actively trying to remove cash from the system. In November 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a demonetisation initiative aimed at eradicating black money; Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes ceased to exist as legal tenders and ATM withdrawals were capped. In 2016, nearly 90% of all transactions in India were cash-based; as of 2022, cash in circulation in payment systems had declined to 20%

Most importantly, perhaps, was the introduction of UPI in 2016—an instant, free national mobile payment system based on Aadhaar. With UPI, Indians can use an email-like address to transfer money directly from a Aadhaar-linked bank account, without needing a debit card or wallet. UPI has since become the world’s fifth largest payment network by volume, and a model for the rest of the globe. 

Finally, the Indian market has historically been credit-starved. Only 11% of micro small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in India have access to formal credit, and 60% of all credit demand is unmet. It was shockingly difficult for a low income person to access consumer credit at the time, which presented an opportunity for fintech companies like Branch to extend availability to digital lending.

Graph showing enrollment in Aadhaar Digital ID

India today: Regulation enables innovation

At present, the revolution is in full swing. Over the past 5+ years, RBI has enacted regulations at a rapid pace. In particular, we’ve seen several relevant developments: 

Co-lending lowers the cost of capital for digital lenders

The introduction of co-lending regulations in 2018, and subsequent amendments to it, have materially lowered the cost of funds for digital lenders. Traditionally, banks have primarily served prime customers, resulting in the lowest cost of funds, while digital lenders have targeted slightly riskier segments and consequently have a higher cost of capital. Since digital lenders have a wider distribution and are better equipped to underwrite riskier segments, combining these strengths with a bank’s lower cost of capital benefits everyone in the ecosystem, including the customer. At present, Indian regulators seem most comfortable with co-lending, compared to other possible partnership models between banks and digital players.

Account aggregators streamline digital underwriting

In 2016, the RBI released licensing regulations for a new kind of entity called account aggregators, which are authorized to collate all financial data (bank accounts, investments, insurance, etc.) in a single database. Digital lenders can then access this comprehensive repository, with customer consent, to assess the customer’s ability to repay. This presented a vast improvement over the previous process—in which lenders needed to request each piece of information from customers—which both eased the process of digital underwriting and reduced drop-offs in the digital application process. 

Visualization of data sharing via account aggregators

OCEN digitally connects consumers, lenders, and loan service providers

The Open Credit Enablement Network (OCEN) is an open protocol which can theoretically bring all lenders and customers together under one roof. (Currently, banks representing ~80%+ of the market share are plugged into this network.) Each lender can choose to plug into this protocol. Similarly, consumer-facing platforms can connect to the protocol, thereby allowing users to access credit from the lenders who choose to lend via this protocol. This has the potential not only to expand the customer base of digital lenders, but also to allow non-lenders to offer financial products on their platforms. 

Digital lending guidelines protect customers and promote trust

In August 2022, the RBI published a set of much anticipated regulations that were tailor-made for digital lenders. The guidelines put requirements in place to protect customers’ interests and established rules around fees, the use of digital signatures, data collection, and more. This both improved customer trust in digital lending and provided authorities with tools to hold errant lenders accountable.

In addition, the Indian government has been working closely with Google Play to protect consumers from unscrupulous lenders. For example, based on government directives, Google Play has been actively blacklisting illegal lending apps that abuse customer trust.  India is also moving towards a whitelist approach, allowing only lending apps that are approved and maintained by a regulated entity to list on Google Play—and removing those that are not. In addition, the government is inclined to reduce the influence of apps with ties to non-friendly nations and restrict data access to such state actors. Such actions are often coordinated with law enforcement agencies, where needed.

At the moment, India is perhaps the fastest growing fintech market in the world. In fact, fintech has a chance of fully driving the economy. The country leads the world in real-time digital payments. 

Since being granted the first-ever E-NBFC (non-banking financial company) license in 2019, Branch International’s growth has been propelled by demand in India. For context, Branch receives around 20,000 new user loan applications from Indian consumers every day. In the U.S., this kind of organic growth in fintech is unusual. In India, it’s unimpressive.  

Graph showing new user loan applications from Indian consumers for Branch International

Going forward, RBI has shown an intent to support fintech innovation within well-defined guardrails

Through proactive engagement and transparent communication, India’s central bank has demonstrated an openness to feedback and consultation with the fintech sector as it advances regulation, both at the policy formulation stage and after changes are enacted. Such pro-innovation measures make India a massive opportunity for fintech, both for founders and the country’s increasingly digital-first population.  

See a16z.com/global-payments for more. 

About the Contributor

Matt Flannery

is the cofounder and CEO of Branch, a digital lender and mobile-first neobank with over 40 million downloads across Africa and India.

Want More a16z Fintech?

Commentary and analysis on recent news, and compelling trends in the fintech space.

Learn More
Recommended For You

Fintech Fuels Global Payments

Angela Strange, Joe Schmidt, Gabriel Vasquez, Lauren Murrow, and Denis Young
Fintech

Software Transcends Borders—Why Not Money?

Angela Strange, Joe Schmidt, and Gabriel Vasquez
Fintech

Brazil’s Surprising Fintech Tailwind

Angela Strange and Flora Oliveira
Fintech

The Company of the Future is Default Global

Anish Acharya, Angela Strange, Seema Amble, and Joe Schmidt
Fintech

Latin America’s Fintech Boom

Angela Strange and Matthieu Hafemeister

Want More Fintech?

Commentary and analysis on recent news, and compelling trends in the fintech space.

Sign Up On Substack

Views expressed in “posts” (including podcasts, videos, and social media) are those of the individual a16z personnel quoted therein and are not the views of a16z Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. a16z Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell — or a solicitation of an offer to buy — any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.

The contents in here — and available on any associated distribution platforms and any public a16z online social media accounts, platforms, and sites (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) — should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here or on a16z content distribution outlets are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources, including from portfolio companies of funds managed by a16z. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, a16z has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. In addition, posts may include third-party advertisements; a16z has not reviewed such advertisements and does not endorse any advertising content contained therein. All content speaks only as of the date indicated.

Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website — or on associated content distribution outlets — be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles — which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters.

There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available here: https://a16z.com/investments/. Past results of a16z’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Excluded from this list are investments (and certain publicly traded cryptocurrencies/ digital assets) for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly. As for its investments in any cryptocurrency or token project, a16z is acting in its own financial interest, not necessarily in the interests of other token holders. a16z has no special role in any of these projects or power over their management. a16z does not undertake to continue to have any involvement in these projects other than as an investor and token holder, and other token holders should not expect that it will or rely on it to have any particular involvement.

With respect to funds managed by a16z that are registered in Japan, a16z will provide to any member of the Japanese public a copy of such documents as are required to be made publicly available pursuant to Article 63 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan. Please contact compliance@a16z.com to request such documents.

For other site terms of use, please go here. Additional important information about a16z, including our Form ADV Part 2A Brochure, is available at the SEC’s website: http://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.