Consumer

Instacart

Jeff Jordan Posted September 19, 2023

Investing in Instacart was perhaps the hardest decision I had to make as a venture capitalist.

It was April 2014, and the company was raising its Series B. And by the time we saw the pitch, they already had multiple term sheets. We pulled from my prior marketplaces experience and dove into their business quickly to develop a point-of-view on the opportunity.

First, there was a LOT to like about the company:

  • The market size was, and remains, huge. Grocery is the largest retail category in the U.S., and in 2014, it had the lowest digital penetration of any category.
  • Instacart was taking a unique approach to tackling this category, using a four-sided marketplace dynamic:
    • By partnering with physical grocers, they were able to leverage those partners’ existing investments in construction and inventory. Instacart didn’t need to build and stock warehouses.
    • On the shopper side, Instacart was leveraging the emerging gig economy, which was enabled by the strong penetration of smartphones in the U.S.
    • For consumers, on-demand delivery of groceries with only modest fees was a very compelling offer.
    • Over time, Instacart planned to build out an advertising revenue stream with CPG companies, offering them effective performance marketing with a primed, high-intent audience.
  • The company’s early performance was impressive, and even more impressive was that almost all of the consumer-side growth was organic. Their GMV had almost tripled over the preceding three months and the early performance of their new markets exceeded that of their early markets. Early deal conversations with grocers had the potential to further accelerate growth and improve economics over time.

But there also were concerns:

  • Many companies had tried and failed—spectacularly!—to build digital grocery businesses in the U.S. Remember Webvan and Kozmo?
  • Instacart would be competing with multiple very strong and very well-resourced incumbents also targeting the digital grocery opportunity.
  • The deal was expensive relative to traction. The company was still at a very early stage. With only 40 employees, they had just started to expand outside of San Francisco, Chicago, and Boston. There wasn’t a ton of game film on key issues including growth, new market performance, nor the ability to sign and scale grocer partnerships. They had impressive GMV growth and strong cohort revenue retention, but their unit economics were upside-down.

Beyond the metrics, co-founder and CEO Apoorva Mehta had great founder/product fit. Prior to founding Instacart, Apoorva was a fulfillment optimization software engineer from Amazon. He was the perfect leader for a concept that would require constant optimization to be successful.

a16z has long had an investment theory that we should invest behind strengths of a business model and opportunity, not lack of weakness. Instacart is a case study of this. Focusing on the former was key to our investment decision.

The more I got exposed to the details behind the Instacart business, the more it reminded me of OpenTable (where I had been CEO from 2007-2011). Both needed to convince businesses to join the platform with the promise that they would drive incremental revenue. Both offered consumers a ton of convenience through their service. And both had the potential to establish network effects if they were successful. The OpenTable story had ended well, and I became increasingly convinced that Instacart had the same potential.

We ended up issuing a term sheet on the round and were delighted when we won the opportunity to lead. Nine years later, and Instacart has just gone public. Has it been easy? HELL NO! My two most memorable bumps along the way:

  • Instacart’s first deal with a leading U.S. grocer was with Whole Foods, who quickly became Instacart’s largest partner. So imagine the FUD that was generated by Amazon’s announcement that it was purchasing Whole Foods. Amazon had been signaling large ambitions in grocery, and they just stole our largest customer. With the benefit of hindsight, however, the Amazon/Whole Foods tie-up was actually a strong positive for Instacart as every other leading grocer in America immediately recognized that they needed a digital strategy. Most turned quickly to Instacart.
  • The COVID pandemic turned everyone’s world upside-down. Grocery delivery immediately became an “essential service” and all digital grocery players in the U.S. were challenged to rise to a massive need (and opportunity). Instacart performed exceptionally well, scaling their operationally intensive model to grow GTV from $5.1 billion to $20.7 billion from 2019 to 2020.

HUGE shout outs to the Instacart teams that turned a small start-up into a digital grocery juggernaut over the course of the past nine years. It truly has been a team effort.

  • Apoorva did everything you could hope for when backing a founder. He was seemingly fearless, channeling David against multiple grocery delivery Goliaths. He willed Instacart into a market leadership role with the help of his early executive team, including Nilam Ganenthiran, Ravi Gupta, Sagar Sanghvi, and many others who contributed enormously over the years. We can’t thank him enough for his vision, dedication, and effectiveness. In his final notable act as CEO, he selflessly entrusted the company to Fidji Simo, a highly capable and strategic leader for its next phase of growth.
  • Fidji hit the ground running as the new CEO. She’s also built out a top-notch management team that stands ready to keep innovating and driving toward Instacart’s mission, including COO Asha Sharma, CFO Nick Giovanni, and CBO Chris Rogers.

We’ve been privileged to be along for the ride at Instacart, and what a ride it’s been!

Want More a16z Consumer?

Analysis and news covering the latest trends reshaping B2C and consumer tech.

Learn More
Recommended For You

Want More Consumer?

Analysis and news covering the latest trends reshaping B2C and consumer tech.

Sign Up On Substack

Views expressed in “posts” (including podcasts, videos, and social media) are those of the individual a16z personnel quoted therein and are not the views of a16z Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. a16z Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell — or a solicitation of an offer to buy — any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.

The contents in here — and available on any associated distribution platforms and any public a16z online social media accounts, platforms, and sites (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) — should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here or on a16z content distribution outlets are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources, including from portfolio companies of funds managed by a16z. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, a16z has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. In addition, posts may include third-party advertisements; a16z has not reviewed such advertisements and does not endorse any advertising content contained therein. All content speaks only as of the date indicated.

Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website — or on associated content distribution outlets — be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles — which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters.

There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available here: https://a16z.com/investments/. Past results of a16z’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Excluded from this list are investments (and certain publicly traded cryptocurrencies/ digital assets) for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly. As for its investments in any cryptocurrency or token project, a16z is acting in its own financial interest, not necessarily in the interests of other token holders. a16z has no special role in any of these projects or power over their management. a16z does not undertake to continue to have any involvement in these projects other than as an investor and token holder, and other token holders should not expect that it will or rely on it to have any particular involvement.

With respect to funds managed by a16z that are registered in Japan, a16z will provide to any member of the Japanese public a copy of such documents as are required to be made publicly available pursuant to Article 63 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan. Please contact compliance@a16z.com to request such documents.

For other site terms of use, please go here. Additional important information about a16z, including our Form ADV Part 2A Brochure, is available at the SEC’s website: http://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.